SaaS contracts, enterprise agreements, Canadian customer terms, hiring Canadian engineers, IP licensing, and privacy compliance — for software companies on either side of the border. Two decades of cross-border tech experience, including in-house counsel to an international software company.
Software companies — particularly SaaS and enterprise software vendors — face a specific cluster of Canadian-law questions that don't always come up cleanly in standard US-drafted templates. The firm has worked with software companies for over two decades, including in an in-house capacity as senior corporate counsel to a large Canadian-based international software company. That experience translates directly into faster, more practical advice for software clients today.
Selling SaaS or enterprise software to Canadian customers — whether as a US vendor selling north, or a Canadian vendor selling under Canadian law — raises questions about enforceability of limitation-of-liability provisions, warranty disclaimers, indemnities, and consequential-damages exclusions. Canadian courts apply doctrines (most notably the post-Tercon framework on exclusion clauses) that differ from US case law and can affect how aggressively a contract can be drafted.
Software products that touch Canadian users trigger Canadian privacy law obligations: PIPEDA at the federal level, plus provincial statutes in Quebec (Law 25, which has specific provisions on automated decision-making and cross-border transfers), British Columbia (PIPA), Alberta (PIPA), and an evolving regime in Ontario. SaaS terms drafted only for GDPR or CCPA compliance often miss Canadian-specific requirements around consent, breach notification, and consent for data transfers outside Canada.
US software companies hiring their first Canadian engineer or sales rep face a series of questions: contractor versus employee classification under Canadian common law, reasonable-notice obligations on termination, provincial employment standards, equity grant treatment under Canadian tax, and whether the hire creates a Canadian permanent establishment for tax purposes. The firm regularly handles these for US software companies — often with Canadian payroll providers like Deel, Remote, or a Canadian PEO already in the picture.
Channel partnerships with Canadian resellers or distributors raise their own contracting questions — territory definitions, exclusivity, Canadian dollar pricing, GST/HST handling, and termination-and-transition provisions that are enforceable under Canadian law.
Canadian copyright and IP law differs in meaningful ways from US law, particularly around moral rights, employee-created IP, and open-source license interpretation. Reviewing IP assignments, licensing agreements, and contributor agreements for Canadian-law enforceability is a regular part of the practice.
For US acquirers looking at Canadian software targets — or Canadian software companies being acquired by US buyers — the firm acts as Canadian local counsel: diligence, deal-document review, Canadian-law opinion letters, and post-closing integration of Canadian operations.
The firm acts as a practical extension of an in-house legal team — fast turnaround, senior input, and a US-aware view of how Canadian law actually applies to a software business.
Most US software companies don't need a full-service Canadian law firm — they need a senior Canadian lawyer who picks up the phone, understands SaaS contracting from both sides, and can quote a fixed fee for a clearly scoped piece of work. That is what the firm is built to do.
For ongoing work, the firm offers an external Canadian general counsel relationship: a monthly retainer that covers routine Canadian-law questions, plus fixed-fee scoping for larger matters. Many US software clients run for years on this structure.
Both. The firm regularly works with seed and Series A SaaS companies hiring their first Canadian employee or signing their first Canadian enterprise customer, as well as with larger software businesses needing ongoing Canadian counsel. Fixed-fee scoping makes early-stage work practical.
Yes — this is one of the most common engagements. The firm reviews the master services agreement, data processing addendum, and any country-specific terms against Canadian federal and provincial law, then provides a marked-up version with explanations of each change.
Often, yes. A Canadian PEO handles payroll and benefits compliance well, but they do not generally advise on IP assignment under Canadian law, equity grant treatment, restrictive covenants enforceability, or whether the contractor relationship creates permanent establishment risk for the US company. Those are areas where a Canadian lawyer review meaningfully reduces risk.
Standard turnaround is two to five business days. Rush turnaround — same-day or next-day — is available for active enterprise deal cycles where Canadian-law sign-off is the gating item.
Yes. The firm regularly provides Canadian-law opinions on enforceability, due authorization, and corporate matters for software M&A transactions and financings.
Yes. The firm handles federal or provincial incorporation, extra-provincial registration, director and officer matters, shareholder structuring, and the related early questions about employment, IP, and tax — coordinating with tax counsel where needed.
Most SaaS engagements are quoted on a fixed-fee or capped-fee basis after a short intake call. Ongoing external general counsel relationships are typically structured as a monthly retainer plus fixed-fee scoping for larger projects.
Whether it's a single contract review or ongoing external counsel, initial consultations are short and no-cost.
Get in Touch